| |
 |
 |
Caroline's Corner: The Market Research Society Conference, or Usability? What's that?
Source: UN, 31 March 2003
Submitted by
Caroline Jarrett
A few years ago, I realised that when we're testing products with the general public, we're actually doing a type of market research. So I joined the Market Research Society in the hope of making connections with other market researchers, and finding out how the user research techniques we use as part of user-centred design are viewed by the market research industry in general. I've found that their codes of conduct are good: thoughtfully written, carefully policed, and work well in practice. And I've enjoyed reading the monthly magazine. So this year I thought 'time to go to the conference' and took myself off to Birmingham for three days.
Conference tip 1: always read the advance programme before you get there. Oops - I didn't. So I pitched up at the time advertised on the conference joining instructions, 10:00 only to find that the conference proper started at 13:00. At least I had plenty of time to decide what I wanted to go to.
Conference tip 2: lug a laptop with a long battery life. The conference bag was nice-looking but light and oh, no: the proceedings were on CD-ROM. I chose my laptop for its big screen. Battery life is not its strong point. So, reduced to trying to make notes without any handouts. Actually, apart from these two little gripes the conference organisation was excellent.
Conference tip 3: bring your toothbrush. The exhibition featured quite a good range of stands - mostly trying to sell me research, but including some interesting-looking survey design software and a gadget I couldn't resist: a tiny audio recorder using flash memory. Also two great ideas: a 'relaxation zone' where you could get a head and neck massage or a drink of water, and a 'meet the speakers' area where speakers congregated after the sessions. Why the toothbrush? Because nearly all the give-aways were sweets or chocolate.
Conference tip 4: pace yourself. I find the concentrated listening required for a bunch of useful papers is really tiring. The Wednesday afternoon track that I chose was well worth the effort. The most useful papers for me were on on falling response rates (qualitative response rates are getting close to the 2% that is such a problem with quantitative), the 'professional respondents' who claim to be, say, 35-year-old purchasers of the Daily Mail one day and 25-year-old purchasers of nappies the next, and four people's ideas on how qualitative market researchers could apply their skills to other types of work. But I really didn't want to start again at 9:00 with another set of concentrated listening. Instead, I enjoyed a nice walk along the Birmingham canals and felt refreshed and ready for the next track.
Conference tip 5: don't worry about the incomprehensible paper - try reading it later. The Thursday morning offered a terrific selection of material on difficult-to-research groups such as people with learning difficulties and substance abusers. It also offered a paper on two proposed new satisfaction measures: subjective well-being (SWB) and Everyday Quality of Life (EQL). Listening to this reminded me of happy moments at BHCIG conferences trying to hang in there with John Long's papers: lots of words, many of which seem familiar, so why can't I make sense of it? Now, where's that CD-ROM?
Conference tip 6: learn something! The Thursday afternoon papers had three new ideas for me: the concept of using archetypes from storytelling to create brand myths, the thought that maybe we should be researching 'persuaders' who disseminate ideas rather than 'typical' users, and a fun exercise that worked with a big group (over 200 people).
Conference tip 7: speak to your title. One paper was called 'What do planners do anyway?' and I thought: yes, what do they do? (These being advertising agency planners.) Might be useful to find out. Well, I didn't. Still no wiser.
And what did all this have to do with usability? I had hoped to encounter a few other people who were interested in usability, maybe even some market researchers who had added usability testing to their repertoire. If they were there then I didn't find them. Anyone care to join me in suggesting a paper for next year? Because this year's conference was good value, and they seemed open to new ideas.
Caroline welcomes comments at: caroline.jarrett@effortmark.co.uk
Caroline Jarrett Independent usability consultant specialising in forms, questionnaires and data capture. Caroline is organiser of Hot Topics in Usability... a conference where usability does feature!
Effortmark Ltd w. www.effortmark.co.uk e. caroline.jarrett@effortmark.co.uk p. +44 (0)1525 370379
Associated Link:
Effortmark
|
|
 |
 |
|
All change at the top for System Concepts Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009 Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts. Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up Source: UN, 2 July 2009 Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages... Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009 The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website. Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus Source: UN, 30 June 2009 Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier. Cell Phones that Listen and Learn Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009 New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds. Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009 Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers. Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’ Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009 In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.
And what do you do? Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009 How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll. Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009 It's all about 'meaningful use'. Glossy monitors look good but can hurt Source: QUT, 23 June 2009 A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.
|
|
|