Skip to main content
UsabilityNews.com - for all the latest in usability and human-computer interaction
BCS Interaction
 
 
The All the Latest section presents all general usability news articles


 
  advanced search
 

All the Latest

Eyetracker Study gives Guidance on how to Place Ads, Etc


Source: UN, 16 December 2003
Submitted by Ann Light

The Usability Company and Eyetracker recently conducted an eyetracking study to provide more information on where designers should place elements, such as logos, search boxes and advertisements on a website, by determining where people look on a page.

They studied eye movements of people using three well-known newspaper sites - The
Times, The Guardian and The Financial Times. Participants in the research were asked to complete a number of very simple tasks on the three sites. These tasks were typical of the kinds of things people would be doing in the real world. For example, the first task they were asked to
complete was ‘Please go to the Business sect ion of the site’. The order of the sites was rotated to minimise any learning effects.

While using the sites peoples’ eye movements were recorded and they were questioned about their impressions of the sites. Each participant completed a questionnaire to determine if they could recall the advertisements on each site.

The research suggests:
* People learned very quickly where advertisements were likely to appear on a site and subsequently ignored those areas of the page when browsing. For example, while people viewed the adverts on the right hand side of the Guardian home page they rarely, if ever, looked to the
right hand side of subsequent pages on the Guardian site - they had ‘learned’ that this area was reserved for advertising and therefore not of interest to them. Likewise having seen the banner ad at the top of The Times homepage very few people looked at the banner ad on other pages of the site. This finding has, of course, repercussions for all those sites that have a template design where advertisements will always be presented in the same position. It would certainly be more effective to alter the positioning of advertising from page to page (or at least section to section) of a site.

* When asked to go to one of the main sections of the sites ( ie. business section) participants found the section much faster on The Times and The FT sites compared to the Guardian site. The reasons are twofold:
1. people have learned that a site’s main navigation resides more often than not on the left hand side of the page (when asked to find the sites’ main sections peoples’ eyes went directly to the left hand side of the page)
2. people find it much easier to scan information vertically than horizontally. Advertising positioned within the body of the site has a far greater probability of being recalled than advertising located in the ‘traditional’ areas for advertising - at the top of the page and to the right hand side.
* Not surprisingly people’s eyes were drawn to images and to headlines. However, people's eyes were much more likely to fixate on a line of text rather than a block. This is consistent with the finding in many usability studies that people are reluctant to read online - preferring to scan
instead.
* People could recall the presence of animated advertising on sites much more than static advertising but the recall of the content of animated advertising was not any better than static advertisements.
* While there were variations in the eye movements of people from site to site and even from page to page within each site the following pattern consistently emerged. It appears that people look to the middle of a page initially then towards the area usually inhabited by the logo of the site, followed by the left hand side (where they expect to find the main navigation) before scanning the areas to the right of the page.


Other News

Increase data Usability, save Billions
Source: ZDNet, 6 September 2010
 
Data usability? less sexy than social emotional interfaces, more money than you can imagine.

Three Things Steve Krug Didn’t Tell You About Usability Testing
Source: George Saines, 2 September 2010
 
Don't make me think. Well, ok, maybe a little bit.

Trace exactly what Users are doing
Source: killerstartups, 30 August 2010
 
A new tool lets you watch all of your website activity, in real-time replays.

Google boosts Usability with Gmail revamp
Source: V3.co.uk, 28 August 2010
 
Long overdue improvements to Gmail may increase its appeal to business users.

Tech4Africa conference runs in Johannesburg
Source: bizcommunity, 26 August 2010
 
A new conference in Africa recognises usability as a central concept to IT uptake.

Top 3 Usability Tips for Building Better Blogs
Source: CMS Wire, 24 August 2010
 
If you're compelled to blog, may as well get it right.

Outdoors and Out of Reach, Studying the Brain
Source: New York Times, 23 August 2010
 
Fascinating account of how heavy use of digital devices changes how we think and behave, and how a retreat into nature might reverse those effects.

Tips for International In-home User Research
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 20 August 2010
 
In-home user research can provide richer, more illuminating information than lab-based studies. Here are some tips for a successful in-home international research.

New Study- Gender differences in Web Usability
Source: Demystifying Usability blog, 18 August 2010
 
Comscore has released a new study (June 30 2010) entitled Women on the Web: How Women are Shaping the Internet.

UX Myths: Usability testing is Expensive
Source: UX Myths, 16 August 2010
 
Many organizations still believe usability testing is a luxury that requires an expensively equipped lab and takes weeks to conduct.

 
 

 

home | contribute | subscribe | news feed/RSS | search | contact us | disclaimer

UsabilityNews.com (version 1.41), along with its associated web site and content,
are all strictly © Copyright of the BCS Interaction 2001-2010. All rights reserved.

Joanna Bawa (editor), Dave Clarke (founder, designer and developer). Ian Parry (graphics).