Comment: Knocking New Zealand e-Govenment Sites into Shape

Achieving e-Government compliance for New Zealand's public sector websites will require a makeover that's greater than skin-deep.

New Zealand's Minister for State Services has spoken. By 2006 all public service websites will have to be well and truly on the e-Govt Web Guidelines treadmill or face the wrath of the State Services Commissioner.

If the guidelines give you headaches then try looking at it this way - the road to compliance is partly cosmetic surgery, partly psychology and mostly a diet and fitness regime.

As any good health professional will tell you, before surgery you need to be as fit as possible. For a website, your fitness level is greatly influenced by your content management systems and internal communications. A fit e-Government organisation will have designed clear pathways, signposts and checkpoints for its content and communications. A content addition or update process should take less than 24 hours, not weeks.

Then there's the diet – what do you feed your users for breakfast? Is your content lean and meaningful? Are the 'use by' dates still fresh? Do your users come away informed and empowered? If not then your content may be suffering from bloat and rot (redundant, out-of-date and tired).

When it comes to the 'content of your content' there's no quick fix – even web content gurus will merely nod and listen – or maybe spurt a few Gerry McGovern mantras.

Content issues require inside knowledge - an affinity with the psychology of your workplace. Your chief content philosopher may decide you need to consult writers, policy advisors, lawyers and your Minister. They might ask questions such as:
* Is your content accurate, trustworthy - the authoritative version?
* What will be the benefit for the public by placing it online?
* Will your users be prepared to read a document that requires 100 metres of scrolling, or should you reformat it for the web?

You can't be frivolous with what you feed users. Stick to the plan - follow those content mantras on the wall (or embed them as flags in your CMS) - otherwise you could inadvertently end up leaking a draft version of the unauthorised ministerial paper to tomorrow's page one news.

Your information architect and visual designer could be likened to cosmetic surgeons – and it takes a specialists touch to wield the scalpel. They create building blocks for the structure, aesthetics and user interactions for your website. A comprehensive and well-researched navigable landscape is essential for the longevity of your website and user satisfaction. Without a sound framework, your website's renewed face-lift will soon begin to sag. In under a year or two you could be in for another round of expensive surgery.

The overall visual identity you decide on depends on who you're trying to attract – youth, elderly, businesses, ex-pats, scientists or construction workers? If you’re being told your site has to cater to 'everyone in the country' then chances are your website will either be devoid of any personality, or the other extreme, over-flowing with colour and busy-ness – driving your users to distraction.

Too many Government websites (there are exceptions) seem to be taking the blandness pill – playing it safe, not offending anyone, keeping it neutral. But if the State Services Commission wanted that wouldn't they create one mega-bland website template and make every public service adhere to its design? Consider this - strictly speaking an e-Govt website without attention to aesthetic values could be breaking one of the E-Government Unit's strategic objectives – "convenience and satisfaction for users".

Evidence is that aesthetic design (appropriate to your audience groups), directly impacts on the usability of your website as well as the public perception of your organisation. Creating a usable, accessible and visually aesthetic website is a challenge, but it can be done. Take a look at www.webstandardsawards.com for examples.

As you can see, a kissable e-Govt Web Guidelines makeover is more than a quick nip and tuck and some designer drugs. It requires inner reflection, a fitness regime, a sturdy framework and ongoing commitment. Good news is you've got just under three years to make it happen – the treadmill is starting to whirr – will you be able to keep up by 2006?

Zef Fugaz

Associated Link: Zefamedia original article (complete with hyperlinks): Kissing the Lips of E-Govt

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.