Comment: Usability is dead, long live Product Value

Do we really need usability policies? Isn't it the usability police and gurus that gets us all a bad name?

Effective usability processes are impossible without a clear understanding of the value that a system is intended to deliver (something I'll be talking about at CHI 2004 in a short paper). We first moved towards this in our work on structured usability problem extraction when we had to find a way to separate relevant user difficulties from irrelevant/trivial ones (some call this severity rating, but that misses the point as severity depends on impact, and not on the 'strength' of the problem). So, without a clear view of how quality in use will enhance or destroy product value, one cannot objectively apply severity ratings (and we know how much individual difference there can be in severity ratings, especially when based on naff universal scales).

The same applies to fitness for purpose. (Poor) fit to usage context can (destroy) enhance product value, but again the impact is not an attribute of the misfit. It is an attribute of the *consequences* of the misfit during usage. All problems lie in interaction, not in the product.

Quality in use and fit to context are our fundamental yardsticks in HCI. However, we cannot objectively or effectively put measures and analyses here to good use without a clear view of intended product value and its implications for quality in use and fit to context. It is these implications, and not the crusading zeal of the usability police, that tells us how slow is too slow, how much is too much, and how poor is too poor. Jared Spool has been hinting at a similar line of analysis when he claims that the usability groups with the best performance/credibility/viability are those who clearly address business needs.

So, in my view, usability policies can only point your car at a brick wall. If you drive slowly, it will take a while to hit it, but if you move at all, you'll hit it eventually. The wall is made up of incredulity, mistrust and hostility from colleagues in development and management as they (sometimes rightly) write off reported usability problems as irrelevant and trivial (perhaps tarring the usability specialist with the same brush as we say up North).

What is needed for all product development, whether commercial, public, social, communal or otherwise, is a clear statement of intended product value that can be used to systematically derive targets for quality in use and fit to context. This should mean that measures will be made and analyses of fit will be carried out. Policies are needed that allow the necessary measurements to be made, and information on usage contexts must be collected and retained to support analysis of fit. At this point we are back into mainstream HCI and (as long as the measures or contextual data are well understood) we know what we are doing (there are even ISO standards at this point). However, don't start here with your policies. Put them in a broader context of product value and people will see the need to testing and analysis, and the need to provide the resources to do this properly.

Usability is dead, long live product value...

Gilbert Cockton Chair of Interactive Digital Media, Research Chair in HCI, Project Director NITRO, University of Sunderland. Chair of the British HCI Group.

(a version of this comment first appeared on the Syntagm-run UCD discussion list: UCD@LISTS.SYNTAGM.CO.UK)

Increase data Usability, save Billions
Source: ZDNet, 6 September 2010
 
Data usability? less sexy than social emotional interfaces, more money than you can imagine.

Three Things Steve Krug Didn’t Tell You About Usability Testing
Source: George Saines, 2 September 2010
 
Don't make me think. Well, ok, maybe a little bit.

Trace exactly what Users are doing
Source: killerstartups, 30 August 2010
 
A new tool lets you watch all of your website activity, in real-time replays.

Google boosts Usability with Gmail revamp
Source: V3.co.uk, 28 August 2010
 
Long overdue improvements to Gmail may increase its appeal to business users.

Tech4Africa conference runs in Johannesburg
Source: bizcommunity, 26 August 2010
 
A new conference in Africa recognises usability as a central concept to IT uptake.

Top 3 Usability Tips for Building Better Blogs
Source: CMS Wire, 24 August 2010
 
If you're compelled to blog, may as well get it right.

Outdoors and Out of Reach, Studying the Brain
Source: New York Times, 23 August 2010
 
Fascinating account of how heavy use of digital devices changes how we think and behave, and how a retreat into nature might reverse those effects.

Tips for International In-home User Research
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 20 August 2010
 
In-home user research can provide richer, more illuminating information than lab-based studies. Here are some tips for a successful in-home international research.

New Study- Gender differences in Web Usability
Source: Demystifying Usability blog, 18 August 2010
 
Comscore has released a new study (June 30 2010) entitled Women on the Web: How Women are Shaping the Internet.

UX Myths: Usability testing is Expensive
Source: UX Myths, 16 August 2010
 
Many organizations still believe usability testing is a luxury that requires an expensively equipped lab and takes weeks to conduct.