Comment: Usability is dead, long live Product Value

Do we really need usability policies? Isn't it the usability police and gurus that gets us all a bad name?

Effective usability processes are impossible without a clear understanding of the value that a system is intended to deliver (something I'll be talking about at CHI 2004 in a short paper). We first moved towards this in our work on structured usability problem extraction when we had to find a way to separate relevant user difficulties from irrelevant/trivial ones (some call this severity rating, but that misses the point as severity depends on impact, and not on the 'strength' of the problem). So, without a clear view of how quality in use will enhance or destroy product value, one cannot objectively apply severity ratings (and we know how much individual difference there can be in severity ratings, especially when based on naff universal scales).

The same applies to fitness for purpose. (Poor) fit to usage context can (destroy) enhance product value, but again the impact is not an attribute of the misfit. It is an attribute of the *consequences* of the misfit during usage. All problems lie in interaction, not in the product.

Quality in use and fit to context are our fundamental yardsticks in HCI. However, we cannot objectively or effectively put measures and analyses here to good use without a clear view of intended product value and its implications for quality in use and fit to context. It is these implications, and not the crusading zeal of the usability police, that tells us how slow is too slow, how much is too much, and how poor is too poor. Jared Spool has been hinting at a similar line of analysis when he claims that the usability groups with the best performance/credibility/viability are those who clearly address business needs.

So, in my view, usability policies can only point your car at a brick wall. If you drive slowly, it will take a while to hit it, but if you move at all, you'll hit it eventually. The wall is made up of incredulity, mistrust and hostility from colleagues in development and management as they (sometimes rightly) write off reported usability problems as irrelevant and trivial (perhaps tarring the usability specialist with the same brush as we say up North).

What is needed for all product development, whether commercial, public, social, communal or otherwise, is a clear statement of intended product value that can be used to systematically derive targets for quality in use and fit to context. This should mean that measures will be made and analyses of fit will be carried out. Policies are needed that allow the necessary measurements to be made, and information on usage contexts must be collected and retained to support analysis of fit. At this point we are back into mainstream HCI and (as long as the measures or contextual data are well understood) we know what we are doing (there are even ISO standards at this point). However, don't start here with your policies. Put them in a broader context of product value and people will see the need to testing and analysis, and the need to provide the resources to do this properly.

Usability is dead, long live product value...

Gilbert Cockton Chair of Interactive Digital Media, Research Chair in HCI, Project Director NITRO, University of Sunderland. Chair of the British HCI Group.

(a version of this comment first appeared on the Syntagm-run UCD discussion list: UCD@LISTS.SYNTAGM.CO.UK)

Rest your Wrists when you're Writing on the go
Source: UN, 25 July 2008
 
Computer Intelligence, Inc. has launched Intelligels(R), a line of wrist rests for laptop computers.

Brits more hooked on mobile tech than Yanks are
Source: RegisterHardware, 24 July 2008
 
According to the latest edition of Carphone Warehouse’s Mobile Life Report, 94 per cent of British youngsters own mobile phones, compared to just 80 per cent of those in the US.

Five ways to Improve online cross- and up-selling
Source: Webcredible, 23 July 2008
 
Increasing cross-selling and up-selling on your website will help sell more items and keep customers coming back.

Say goodbye to the Computer Mouse
Source: BBC, 22 July 2008
 
It's nearly 40 years old but one leading research company says the days of the computer mouse are numbered.

LowBrowse: a web browser for the Visually Impaired
Source: UN, 21 July 2008
 
An innovative new add-on software tool will enable millions of people worldwide with low vision to access previously inaccessible web pages.

Now you can See your Voicemail
Source: UN, 19 July 2008
 
Speech Design's new Visual Voice Mail 'pushes' voice messages directly to mobile handsets, eliminating push-button retrieval.

User-centred research into mobile law enforcement recognised
Source: UN, 18 July 2008
 
C-innovate, a user-centred consultancy based at the Sussex Innovation Centre at the University of Sussex, has won an award for its research into mobile technology and innovation in the public sector.

The Web speaks up
Source: UN, 17 July 2008
 
Textic Limited has just announced the commercial launch of Talklets, a Web 2.0 service that ‘voice enables’ text-based Web content.

All-in-One Devices ride again
Source: Wall St Journal: Market Watch, 16 July 2008
 
Evolutions of all-in-one devices and internet-TV functionality will fuel the nascent home theatre PC market, according to ABI Research.

How to Succeed as a First-Time UX Manager
Source: UXMatters, 15 July 2008
 
Being a manager of UX is no better — and no worse — than being a great designer or user researcher, but the roles are very different.