Response: Why Readability Testing is not Enough

The recent press coverage of the Bath University research paper "Readability Assessment of British Internet Information Resources on Diabetes Mellitus Targeting Laypersons" (including UN's own story: NHS Direct Website too complicated for Diabetes Sufferers) has raised interesting questions about some of the methodologies used to measure users' experience on the Web.

The research assessed the readability of 20 information resources on diabetes using Microsoft Word's automated testing feature, which gives a Flesch-Kincaid Grade (rates text on a US grade-school level; the lower the score, the easier it is to understand the document.) and Flesch Reading Ease level (rates text on a 100-point scale; the higher the score, the easier it is to understand the document) score. This was then compared against the 'average' reading age of the population giving the conclusion that a majority of the sites tested were 'too complicated' for their readers.

On the face of it, this conclusion and the methodology used is fine, but due to the indiscriminate nature of automated testing tools, it doesn’t present the entire picture and, at worst, can give the impression that the users of these websites can’t understand the content at all, which may not be the case.

For example;

• A health website which uses (and in most cases defines) medical terminology would score high when evaluated using 'Readability formulae that estimate the reading level of a document based on the words that are used and the lengths of sentences'.

• The readers of such information would most likely have a good understanding of the medical environment surrounding their condition, which would make the articles easier to understand.

It’s this lack of context in the research that gives the biggest cause for concern, as some of the sites tested may automatically try to lower the reading age of their articles. They would then run the risk of alienating their actual users, who might not need a simpler article!

I would forgive anyone reading this for thinking that I’m dismissing the research out of hand, but in fact I welcome any research that can help us to provide a better service to our users. This research has done that because it’s made the people in the healthcare community look at how readable their websites are. But the key message is, and should always be, know your users and test against them not just by using automated tools.

(In case you're wondering, the Flesch-Kincaid Grade and Flesch Reading Ease level of this article is 60.5 and 11.1. I hope you’ve managed to understand it okay!)

Matt Goddard

The views presented in this article are those of the author and not the opinion of NHS Direct.

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.