Caroline's Corner: Registration Forms - what to do if you can’t avoid Them

Last month I looked at a subtle detail on forms, so this month I thought I’d take a step back to look at a whole-form topic: registration forms.

Now the sad thing about registration forms is that users hate them. Stick a form in front of them and they leave your site, they lie, or if they are really web-savvy they use a privacy protection service such as Bugmenot.

But organisations love them. 'We’ll justify/protect/market/leverage this content by asking people to register for it.'

So the first line of argument is: try to avoid asking users to register at all. But I know that this is an unrealistic position. So how can we limit the damage and make the registration process as easy as possible?

RULE: EXPLAIN WHY YOU’RE ASKING
If you shove the questions at the users without any justification, they won’t be happy. Put in a very short sentence that says why you are asking them to register. Hint: the sentence 'Click here to learn about the benefits of registering' will NOT do, because it’s forcing yet another task between your users and their goal.

RULE: MAKE SURE YOU OFFER SOMETHING THAT USERS WANT
The benefit that you offer for registering must be a benefit to the user, not to your organisation. Hint: 'We’re asking you to register because our advertisers demand it' will NOT do, because it’s no benefit to the users.

SUGGESTION: OFFER A PRE-REGISTRATION SAMPLE
One way of persuading users to register is to offer them some way of sampling the benefit they’ll get from registering. You could give them the top couple of paragraphs of an article, a couple of screen-shots from a demo, or a sample of the newsletter they’re subscribing to. It all helps to build trust and create a relationship.

RULE: FEWER QUESTIONS = BETTER
Your users are busy people and you’re interrupting them. Be polite: keep your interruptions to a minimum. Can you restrict your process to a single question? Great, go for it. For example, if all you really need to do is assure yourself that you are dealing with adults for legal reasons, then just ask the single question: 'Are you over 18?'.

RULE: LESS INVASIVE QUESTIONS = BETTER
It’s even more important to be careful about asking invasive questions such as personal data. That’s both because users don’t like giving it to you, and because there are laws about it. Ask someone’s name and you’re into the world of privacy policies ... a whole topic in itself.

RULE: ASK ONCE ONLY
I was prompted to write about this topic because I was trying to track down an elusive news story about a tax forms designer who was suspended for putting jokes in the forms. Hmm, shall I keep it anonymous or shall I name and shame? What the heck, let’s go for naming. It turned out that the story was first published by the Middletown Journal. So off I went and I found that you can read parts of the paper online but other bits require registration. OK, I’m not thrilled about registering but tax form jokes are pretty thin on the ground and I was on a mission. And the registration form assured me that all I needed to do was register. I registered. I searched. I found an abstract of an article that looked like it might be the one I wanted. I tried to read it. Boom, another registration form. No fair! And one that required payment – not a big payment, and I might even have shelled out if I’d been given an honest message on my first registration. But by now, I’d lost faith in the site. Another sad loss of custom caused by a bad registration form.

So my final rule is: don’t surprise people with multiple levels of registration. Be honest about what they’ll get access to – and what they won’t get access to.


If you have any comments or suggestions about this article then please contact Caroline at:

Caroline.Jarrett@Effortmark.co.uk

Caroline Jarrett is a usability consultant specialising in forms, questionnaires and data capture.

© 2005 Caroline Jarrett, all rights reserved.

Associated Link: Effortmark

'Internet addiction' linked to Depression
Source: BBC, 9 February 2010
 
There is a strong link between heavy internet use and depression, UK psychologists have said.

Could *You* be more Usable?
Source: UN, 8 February 2010
 
Bet you could.

Stowe Boyd on 'Steampunk' thinking about the Future of Computing
Source: Stowe Boyd's blog via Experientia, 6 February 2010
 
Are established metaphors of user experience holding us back from new ways of structuring our interaction through computers?

Nokia's User Experience Programme
Source: UN, 5 February 2010
 
Nokia has put together a rich and informative website covering the key elements of user experience.

Interfaces magazine: latest issue available now
Source: HCI News Service, 4 February 2010
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available in pdf format, free from the Interaction Website.

A Lighter Brigade of Chargers
Source: UN, 3 February 2010
 
Lots of gadgets, one charger. At last.

Mobile Touch Screens could soon Feel the Pressure
Source: MIT Technology Review, 2 February 2010
 
A quantum switch could add pressure sensing to mobile screens.

Usability, Usability, Usability: why the iPad will Succeed
Source: Econsultancy, 1 February 2010
 
The tech critics love it, hate it, love it again, shrug it off. What do usability experts say?

British Airways - at last some good news
Source: Loop11, 30 January 2010
 
In a recent website usability study for the world's leading airlines, the British Airways website proved to be the most user friendly, with Malaysia Airlines and Virgin Atlantic having the lowest user experience rating.

Computation of Emotions in Man and Machine
Source: Royal Society, 29 January 2010
 
Advances in computer technology now allow machines to recognise and express emotions, paving the way for improved human-computer and human-human communications.