Skip to main content
UsabilityNews.com - for all the latest in usability and human-computer interaction
BCS Interaction
 
 
The All the Latest section presents all general usability news articles


 
  advanced search
 

All the Latest

Andrew’s Usability in the Real World: Who are our Users?


Source: UN, 18 November 2005
Submitted by Andrew Swartz

Andrew

While the usability profession often discusses the 'how' and 'why' of studying users, we too rarely discuss the 'who'. Who should you include in a usability study?

It's an important question. So much user-centred research relies on small samples, making it especially important to choose the sample wisely. More and more, usability people are asked to comment on whether a product is likely to be used (see my earlier column: Predictive Usability), and poorly chosen samples can lead to circular reasoning.

For example, imagine a company developing a new gadget asks you to study its usability. They tell you that their marketing department has decided on two key market segments: Young Funs and Old Grumpies. You recruit according to this profile, and find that Young Funs like the gadget, while Old Grumpies wouldn't use it in a million years. In many companies, this would be taken to mean young people will use the product, and older people won't, and so only the results from the younger people will be taken into account.

The problem of course is that the segments don't necessarily match the user groups. What about Young Grumpies? What about Old Funs? They weren't included, and so nothing can be generalised about younger and older people.

My colleague Kate McCluskey has been working on a technique drawn from the intersection of anthropology, cultural studies and user-centred design to ensure the right people are included in a study. The technique is called User Type Shaping, and here's what she has to say about it.

==========

A key problem for many organisations is understanding not only who their potential users might be, but also who their current users are. Without knowledge of who the users of a product or service are, deciding who to recruit for user-centred design activities is often a haphazard business, based on assumptions without evidence.
Standard methods only provide limited evidence in this area. For example, web metrics may list the actions happening on a site, but they do not show who is using the site and why they are doing what they are doing. Online surveys may provide some user data; however, this is largely limited, particularly as the respondents are self-selecting. Marketing segmentation schemes may also provide an indication of whom the organisation wishes to target, but it typically doesn't say who the actual users are and how they behave. In response to this problem, we began to develop User Type Shaping.

User Type Shaping employs a combination of techniques to identify who a product’s users are. The first part of the process involves narrowing and focussing the possible field of users by drawing on techniques from cultural studies and anthropology. These techniques illuminate both the context in which the organisation's products exist, and who the products users may be. The study focuses on material culture such as objects, environments, visual and verbal language, media representations, as well as any existing research, and ad hoc interviews. Part of the intention is to understand where and how possible users may come into contact with the product. The research data is then represented visually and analysed until key themes and initial user types emerge.

The initial user types identified during the contextual research are then explored further through field research, using ethnographic-based observations and interviews. Once tested in the field, initial assumptions may be validated or refined, and new user types may be uncovered.

During the field study it is also possible to explore any needs the users might have, and potential opportunity areas for the product. The data from the field research is then analysed and shaped into draft user types and represented by personas. The user types may then be further shaped and refined with key stakeholders in a workshop setting.

Whilst User Type Shaping can be used to create personas, it should not be confused with standard persona development. For not much more effort than standard persona development, User Type Shaping offers an organisation that has previously had little idea of who their users are the opportunity to identify them, based on rich qualitative data which goes beyond that produced by quantitative methods. In addition, it provides the organisation with a rich picture of the cultural landscape in which their product and their users are situated, which is valuable for understanding future opportunities and how the product might be developed and presented. With a picture of who a products users are, User Type Shaping enables the recruitment of participants for future user centred design activities based on evidence that does not rely on a segmentation designed for marketing. During the User Type Shaping process, the organisation's knowledge of who their users are, their attitudes, behaviours, and needs is increased, and since these types will be researched in future studies this knowledge will increase with each study.

==========

I would love to hear what you think. Send me an e-mail at andrew.swartz@serco.com.

by Andrew Swartz,
Serco Usability Services

© 2005 Serco Limited, All Rights Reserved.

 


External link to another web site Associated Link:
Serco Usability Services


Other News

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.

 
 

 

home | contribute | subscribe | news feed/RSS | search | contact us | disclaimer

UsabilityNews.com (version 1.41), along with its associated web site and content,
are all strictly © Copyright of the BCS Interaction 2001-2009. All rights reserved.

Joanna Bawa (editor), Dave Clarke (founder, designer and developer). Ian Parry (graphics).