| |
|
 |
Increased Sophistication of Websites changes Web Accessibility Priorities
Source: UN, 8 December 2005
Submitted by
Ann Light
The increased sophistication of websites has changed the priorities of web accessibility – with effective in-site search, good navigation, and clear, well-constructed content now the three most important usability issues for disabled internet users - according to new research from user experience consultancy User Vision.
The research asked a cross-section of more than 200 web users, with a variety of impairments, to rank, in terms of importance, the factors which aid their ease of use when online. Clarity of content – using straightforward language and a clear, simple layout – was regarded by 88% as ‘very important’. Good navigation – the ability to know where you are within a site – was regarded as very important by 65%, followed by the use of meaningful and clear hyperlinks (63%).
Factors traditionally perceived as the fundamental accessibility issues have become comparatively less significant. Good use of ‘alt tags’, for example, was only regarded as ‘very important’ by a third of respondents - while among the visually impaired users, a surprising 25% found alt tags not important at all.
Respondents were also asked to rank the most annoying and most useful features of websites. Elements that aid users in finding content easily and navigating around sites came up high on the lists, whilst avoiding pop-ups was only fourth in the list of top five annoyances, thanks mainly to the increased use of blockers which eliminate them before they appear. Inevitably scalable text remains an important issue, particularly for visually impaired users.
Top five annoyances 1. Not having in-site search 2. No sitemap 3. No internal page navigation/skip to content/back to top links 4. Pop-ups 5. Inability to change font size/colour contrast
Top five most useful features 1. Having in-site search 2. Having a sitemap 3. Clear, well labelled links 4. Having internal page navigation 5. Ability to personalise page view/font size Chris Rourke, Director of User Vision comments: 'The broadband revolution has led to websites becoming more sophisticated and content-rich, which inevitably increases the risk of creating barriers for impaired users. As a result, factors such as an effective in-site search and navigation are becoming increasingly significant considerations which need to be moved up the development agenda. Overall, web designers must consider how changes in functionality affect accessibility, and ensure that sites are regularly tested using the wide array of devices which those with impairments are using to access the internet.'
Other barriers to good usability for impaired users, according to the research; include Flash Movies, the necessity to ‘sign-in’, too many hyperlinks and online forms where fields/labels have not been marked up properly.
The research also asked respondents to name the websites which they found most and least usable. Google was unanimously voted as easiest to use – thanks mainly to its clear layout and uncluttered design – followed by Yahoo! and BBC News Online. Educational sites, webmail and travel sites all featured heavily in the ‘least usable’ category.
The research questioned a cross-section of 208 internet users throughout the UK with impairments which affect the way they use the internet; comprising the visually impaired/blind, hearing impaired/deaf, physically disabled, and those with dyslexia/learning difficulties. The research was carried out by email/postal questionnaire during October 2005.
|
|
|
 |
|
All change at the top for System Concepts Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009 Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts. Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up Source: UN, 2 July 2009 Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages... Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009 The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website. Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus Source: UN, 30 June 2009 Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier. Cell Phones that Listen and Learn Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009 New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds. Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009 Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers. Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’ Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009 In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.
And what do you do? Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009 How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll. Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009 It's all about 'meaningful use'. Glossy monitors look good but can hurt Source: QUT, 23 June 2009 A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.
|
|
|