Skip to main content
UsabilityNews.com - for all the latest in usability and human-computer interaction
BCS Interaction
 
 
The All the Latest section presents all general usability news articles


 
  advanced search
 

All the Latest

FTSE 100 Websites fail Accessibility Requirements


Source: UN, 20 June 2006
Submitted by Colin Differ

Research conducted by user experience company Nomensa, shows that almost 75% of businesses in the FTSE 100 list of companies fail to meet the minimum requirements for website accessibility. The homepages of each website were measured and evaluated, using manual testing, against the globally recognised Web Content Accessibility Guidelines* (WCAG).

Only 24 sites achieve the minimum level of accessibility – and none go beyond that to double A or triple A standards*. Out of those 24 sites that met some level of accessibility (single A standard*), two companies stood out from the rest: the Daily Mail & General Trust and Xstrata. In fact, these two organisations only failed to reach the next level by one checkpoint.

This one checkpoint was a common point of failure – no means for pages to be expanded or contracted to meet the user's preference. This failure can exclude people that wear glasses or use screen magnification software, and also people using a PDA, internet television or mobile phone.

The five most common website flaws were:
1. Poor quality web code;
2. Poor use of lists;
3. Not using headings and titles properly;
4. Missing alternative text for graphical elements;
5. Using pop-up windows.

Overall, 60 home pages were found to have images that did not come equipped with a text based description, making it impossible for visually impaired people to fully interact with the site.

There were no industry sectors tested that were significantly advanced. However there were some companies within sectors that were notably ahead of their peers. For instance:

* Retail – Marks and Spencer, Sainsbury’s;
* Financial Services – Alliance and Leicester, Royal and Sun Alliance;
* Services – Yell Group, Rentokill-Initial;
* Pharmaceutical – GlaxoSmithKline.

'Rejecting usability, in favour of a flashy front of house, encourages negative feelings which can end up dismissing the brand entirely. In our experience, those companies that bridge the gap between creative design and user experience, encounter a positive effect on their bottom line', says Simon Norris of Nomensa.

Norris also points out that accessibility and usability issues can be accentuated over devices such as mobile phones, PDAs and laptops that are being used to access the Internet without any enhancing software / hardware.

The home pages of 99 FTSE 100 company websites were measured and evaluated, for the first time manually, against the globally recognised Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), over a two week period in April 2006. Of the 47 checkpoints required, only four can be tested automatically with any degree of accuracy. Nomensa used its expert inspectors to carry out the remaining 43 checkpoints manually.

The 99 individual companies who had stock listings on the FTSE 100 were selected from the Financial Times on 8th February 2006. Since this time some websites will have undergone changes, but in order to conform to recognised techniques for conducting accessibility inspections, a definitive timeframe was set.

 


External link to another web site Associated Link:
Nomensa's FTSE reseach


Other News

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.

 
 

 

home | contribute | subscribe | news feed/RSS | search | contact us | disclaimer

UsabilityNews.com (version 1.41), along with its associated web site and content,
are all strictly © Copyright of the BCS Interaction 2001-2009. All rights reserved.

Joanna Bawa (editor), Dave Clarke (founder, designer and developer). Ian Parry (graphics).