Comment: Showing Web Accessibility Statements the Door

Web accessibility is still in its infancy where many attempts are being made to make the web a more accessible place. I believe accessibility statements have good intentions, however as no official guidelines exists everyone has their own interpretation to what they should be. This has led to questions being raised at how effective they really are.

Now, you may think it would be easy to do a search and find the answer to this, however, its not so simple. Have you tried searching on accessibility statement lately? I got over 12M results!

So I decided to take another approach, speaking to real people and through communications on the web. The most popular response I got from the online community was that the issue is covered in PAS 78. However, web accessibility statements have been around alot longer than PAS 78, so that did not add up.

Fear of prosecution
The use of web accessibility statements seems to be linked to the Code of Practice from the DDA. It appears that the fear of being sued over inaccessible websites led to the mass introduction of accessibility statements. This made it appear that people were making an effort to make accessible sites.

Word gets around easily on the web and this resulted in accessibility statements being implemented on many sites (probably around 12 million), usually copied and pasted from on site to another (as no official guidelines existed). The excuse was that they would help users, but time has proven that the actual practice of implementing accessibility statements has not gone according to plan, they are usually:
* Too long
* Technically orientated
* Focused on displaying of adherence to standards

This means they have forgotten about their target audience how would the above benefit a disabled user who just wants to get on with things?

PAS 78
The PAS 78 states that accessibility statements should be used as contact place and for stating accessibility features such as access keys. I say there is no point.
* Most websites have a contact page anyways, why duplicate things?
* There is trend for not implementing access keys as they are believed to not be much use in practice.
* What other features are there to most websites? Increase font size? Tab order? Are these features or just common sense practice? Why state the obvious?

Afterall, if there are a stairs in a building, you wouldn't provide a statement which tells someone how to climb them. (Right leg up, left leg up!)

People keep saying we need it
Most websites are pretty straight forward.
* Do we need to state that standards and tests have passed?
* Do we need to educate a user on how to use a website?

We need to remember that the web is a different and a unique place. Once software is customised to your own needs, a user uses the same actions to perform similar tasks for any website. For example, if you use CTRL + to increase font size for one website, it will be the same for the next website you go to unless you change software/browser purposely. Surely we cannot be responsible for educating each user?

The trend for accessibility professionals
This has contributed another factor. It appears that accessibility is the trend. It's a bit like the agile development movement. Everyone is agile now, people won't hire you unless you state you are agile. It doesn't matter if you are not, it's a badge that people will believe.

So now we have accessible developers, accessible designers, accessibility and usability professionals. Perhaps if I gave myself accessibility software tester aS a title, the world would see me in a different light.

Has the concept of web accessibility been taken too far?

The solution?
I do agree, for more complex and interactive sites, there may be a requirement to offer assistance, but why not have it in a help area which addresses multiple issues. You could call it 'help', 'using this site' or 'about': it would be a central area of help and still be easy to find and of use to everyone who is interested.

Campaign against accessibility statements
A Google search returned over 12M results for accessibility statement. I am campaigning to get this number down by half. Is it possible? Is it daft? Who knows, but I believe that the web will be a more accessible place once we stop bragging about our accessibility greatness.

Rosie Sherry
DrivenQA

Associated Link: DrivenQA

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.