| |
|
 |
Caroline's Corner: How to get Clients to look at Wireframes...Properly
Source: UN, 7 December 2006
Submitted by
Caroline Jarrett
It was the same old story. I was working with Whitney Quesenbery on some wireframes for a client’s web site. As usual, she’d done a lovely job on the design. As usual, I’d fussed around with content. We’d done our usual cross-checking and refinement. Proudly, we emailed them off.
And nothing happened.
We gently reminded the client that we needed their comments.
And nothing happened.
Now, I don’t blame the client here. It’s an important website but they had a lot going on that was higher priority. And perhaps it was better to have no response than a rushed one. But here we were, needing to move forward, and we had to find a way to do it. Sound familiar?
PERSONAS TO THE RESCUE Last year, I wrote about Persona-led Heuristic Inspection, the technique developed by Ginny Redish and Dana Chisnell to solve some of the problems of heuristic inspections of websites. And I’ve been using a similar technique for ages as the basis of expert reviews of forms (for example, see this pdf http://www.usabilityprofessionals.org/usability_resources/conference/2006/jarrett-quesenbery-looking%20at%20forms.pdf).
So we thought: maybe a persona-led inspection could work as a way of getting our clients to look at our wireframes. So we did, it was a success, we had our feedback.
Hmm... that wasn’t much of a story, was it? So let’s dig into it a little deeper.
STEP 1: GATHER YOUR PERSONAS Decide on a set of personas that you will use for the meeting. If you don’t have any yet, you’ll need to create some ‘assumption personas’ - there’s a good selection of resources linked here at the STC Usability and User Experience website.
Gathering personas was very easy for us, because we already have a well-developed set of personas for this client. All we had to do was ensure everyone at the meeting had access to a copy.
STEP 2: INVITE YOUR CLIENTS Ask a small selection of appropriate clients to attend a meeting. Might be helpful to aim for a mixture of areas represented. You want a review of wireframes, not a big discussion of general project progress or whatever, so make it clear that’s why they’re coming.
We had five people at the meeting: two of us, three of them. They had different levels of knowledge of the website in question, and that worked well. I think I’d try to keep to a fairly small, mixed group another time.
STEP 3: PICK A PERSONA Each attendee chooses a persona to concentrate on for the purposes of the meeting. No method acting is required – just making sure that you try to look at each page from the specific point of view of ‘your’ chosen persona.
We let the least experienced attendee have ‘first pick’, and as you might expect she chose the persona who was most similar to herself. You might want to do the opposite, and get people to choose someone the least like themselves. I think perhaps it doesn’t really matter: it’s choosing one specific persona to concentrate on that seems to be important.
STEP 4: SILENT CHOICE OF CLICK – THEN DISCUSS Show everyone the first page of the wireframes. Ask each attendee to decide, silently, where their persona would click. Then discuss the choices and anything else you feel like discussing on that page.
Choose the most popular first click, and repeat the process on the page that click leads to.
Repeat until you’ve covered all the pages that you’re interested in.
The ‘silent choice’ thing seemed to be rather important for us. We gave out printed copies of the wireframes and asked people to mark their copy, so there wasn’t any change of heart when they heard what other people chose. And we got a good variety of choices and feedback on them.
THE RESULTS We got through an amazing amount of material in a 2-hour meeting, with plenty of useful suggestions. The clients had really concentrated on the wireframes and given us good feedback on them. And most importantly, the ‘review wireframes’ task was deleted from everyone’s to-do list – happiness all round.
If you have any comments or suggestions about this article then please contact Caroline at:
Caroline.Jarrett@Effortmark.co.uk
Caroline Jarrett is a usability consultant specialising in forms, questionnaires and data capture.
© 2006 Caroline Jarrett, all rights reserved.
Associated Link:
Effortmark
|
|
|
 |
|
Online poker company uses Science to assess Player Preferences Source: Recentpoker.com, 8 January 2009 Working with customer experience consultancy Foviance, PKR is exploiting the benefits of electroencephalography (EEG) technology to gather information on poker players' emotional relationship with a brand or service.
Do Users really love Laptops? Source: channelinsider, 7 January 2009 More than one-fifth of all laptop computers will break down over the course of their life, and other limitations frustrate their users. From this list of user complaints come laptop opportunities.
User Interviews - Analysis Simplified Source: Webcredible, 6 January 2009 You’ve conducted your user interviews, but now you need to make sense of all that information you’ve gathered. Why Products Fail Source: ComputerWorld, 5 January 2009 Most gadget and software makers don't understand what users want most: control.
How to Design Websites for Mobile Phones Source: stemkoski.com, 3 January 2009 Tips from Ryan Stemkoski's web design blog. Pioneer of Cyberspace honoured Source: BBC, 2 January 2009 A professor who invented a forerunner of the world wide web has been made a dame in the New Year Honours. 2008 in Review: Developments that rocked the world of User Experience Source: Catalyst Resources, 1 January 2009 A look back at 2008 highlights some of the key developments that rocked the world of user experience. 2008: The Year Online Source: MIT Technology Review, 31 December 2008 The business of social networking, cloud computing, and a flaw in the fabric of the Internet top the most notable stories of 2008.
Shoveling through the Spamalanche Source: UN, 30 December 2008 A ‘Spamalanche’ of 3,000 emails will be waiting in your inbox by the time you get back to work. What can you do besides 'delete all'? New guidelines boost Web Access Source: BBC, 29 December 2008 The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has announced a new standard to make sites more accessible to older and disabled people.
|
|
|