Which design? An introduction to Split A/B testing

Following on from any website usability study a number of usability problems are usually found. There can often be debate within any organisation as to the best solution for each problem, with no one really knowing the optimal solution. Rather than letting the person that shouts the loudest get his or her own way, a better solution can be to test two solutions in a live environment. Whichever performs the best is clearly the superior solution. Welcome to split A/B testing!

BURIDAN'S ASS AND A/B TESTING
Did you hear the story of the donkey stood in the middle of two equally appealing stacks of hay? He spent so long trying to decide which one to start eating first that the poor animal starved to death without having moved a single inch. This paradox, first discussed by Aristotle is known as 'Buridan's ass' and is an often discussed psychological phenomenon.

If you're managing a website you might face similar situations when you need to decide which of two different designs to opt for. Nowadays, you need to continuously improve and evolve your site by making small frequent adjustments. But how do you know which change will have the highest impact on the customer experience?

Split A/B testing is a way of finding out which changes help your users' performance. It provides a controlled method of measuring the effectiveness (or not) of alterations to your site. It's often used for small tweaks (eg 'Is this style heading clearer than the original?') but can also be used to test bigger wholesale changes (eg 'Is this new 1-click checkout process better?'). In essence, it involves running two different versions side by side to see which is more effective.

A TYPICAL A/B SCENARIO
You feel your users might not be finding the 'Proceed to checkout' button hidden below the fold of the page and think this might be causing people to leave your site before making a purchase. You've created a new design which you feel is more effective but you'd like to know for sure.

To A/B test your new page, you serve the regular page to say 90% of your visitors as usual, but a randomly selected 10% would be shown your new design. Then you sit back, pour yourself an ice cold gin and tonic, wait and watch your web statistics.

If your new page has a positive effect as you suspect, then you should see an improvement in the 10% group, as measured by conversion rates. Proof that you should publish the more successful page to all visitors.

ADVANTAGES OF SPLIT A/B TESTING
There are a number of benefits to A/B testing:
- Low risk approach
- Cheaper than other methods such as focus groups
- Provides proof
- Invisible to most of your users
- Great way to do 'test run' new designs before full roll-out (to avoid negative surprises on the launch day)
- Can solve internal disputes

DISADVANTAGES OF SPLIT A/B TESTING
A/B testing isn't always suitable. Some of its disadvantages include:
- New designs might have to 'wear in' before you can measure their real performance (visitors' initial response might be negative because they're used to the old solution)
- You can only compare two versions with a single factor that differentiates both designs (for more factors / variations you need to deploy multivariate testing which is more difficult to analyse)
- It takes technical know-how to set up and analyse the results
- You're testing in a live environment so external factors might have an impact on the outcome
- If your site is really in bad shape, you'll still need to do a proper overhaul

IN A NUTSHELL
A/B testing is powerful stuff and a useful method for a quick comparison for two different designs. However, bear in mind that it's no substitute for getting proper feedback from your users. Only this will give you the whole picture - straight from the ass's mouth.

Associated Link: Webcredible - usability & accessibility consultancy

'Internet addiction' linked to Depression
Source: BBC, 9 February 2010
 
There is a strong link between heavy internet use and depression, UK psychologists have said.

Could *You* be more Usable?
Source: UN, 8 February 2010
 
Bet you could.

Stowe Boyd on 'Steampunk' thinking about the Future of Computing
Source: Stowe Boyd's blog via Experientia, 6 February 2010
 
Are established metaphors of user experience holding us back from new ways of structuring our interaction through computers?

Nokia's User Experience Programme
Source: UN, 5 February 2010
 
Nokia has put together a rich and informative website covering the key elements of user experience.

Interfaces magazine: latest issue available now
Source: HCI News Service, 4 February 2010
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available in pdf format, free from the Interaction Website.

A Lighter Brigade of Chargers
Source: UN, 3 February 2010
 
Lots of gadgets, one charger. At last.

Mobile Touch Screens could soon Feel the Pressure
Source: MIT Technology Review, 2 February 2010
 
A quantum switch could add pressure sensing to mobile screens.

Usability, Usability, Usability: why the iPad will Succeed
Source: Econsultancy, 1 February 2010
 
The tech critics love it, hate it, love it again, shrug it off. What do usability experts say?

British Airways - at last some good news
Source: Loop11, 30 January 2010
 
In a recent website usability study for the world's leading airlines, the British Airways website proved to be the most user friendly, with Malaysia Airlines and Virgin Atlantic having the lowest user experience rating.

Computation of Emotions in Man and Machine
Source: Royal Society, 29 January 2010
 
Advances in computer technology now allow machines to recognise and express emotions, paving the way for improved human-computer and human-human communications.