High Fidelity and the Problem with 'Sketching'

This past June I attended UPA's 2007 conference in Austin, Texas. The keynote was given by Bill Buxton, Principal Researcher, Microsoft Research. The focus of Bill's presentation was 'sketching', a timeless core tool for creative design, that in software design is often bypassed in favor of high fidelity digital design tools. He presented two points regarding sketching that made a strong impression on me:

1. No higher resolution than required to communicate the intended purpose/concept;

2. Resolution of the rendering does not suggest a degree of refinement of the concept that exceeds its actual state.

Since the conference, I've been evangelizing this concept internally to my team (product design) as well as to product management and development. But I've hit a few snags in the fast paced world of software development. Namely:

- HIGH FIDELITY SELLS, LOW FIDELITY IS DISMISSED
With many projects facing complex priorities, deadlines, demands from the sales team, and countless other inputs, rough sketches are often not compelling and are easily overlooked or dismissed. A picture is worth a thousand words, but only if the picture is pretty. I constantly push back on higher resolution early on, but without higher resolution the project often doesn't get started in the first place. It's as if a high resoluton rendering is needed to inspire interest, only to be trashed and reworked through the correct sketching process once the project gets moving.

- HIGH FIDELITY COMMUNICATES A SOLUTION, LOW FIDELITY COMMUNICATES A WORK IN PROGRESS
(which is good for execs, but problematic for Development)
Here's one that's a little controversial (until you understand what I'm really trying to say). Low fidelity (rightfully so) communicates an unfinished design; a work in progress. And as Bill states, this is what you want... if your audience is marketing or decision-making executives. But with development it can be a little tricky. When we present something polished-looking to Development, even if it's not completely fleshed out, their reaction tends to be "that looks awesome - when can we get this from you so that we can plug it in?" When we present a sketch or something rough, the reaction is often to go and try to do it themselves.

In some situations this could be a good thing, and may be exactly what Bill is advocating - the roughness encourages others to think and contribute their own ideas instead of assuming it's already done. But in some cases unfortunately, it doesn't promote collaboration - Development just picks up the ball and runs with it without ever looking back. Yes, I know, it's a problem with process and culture. But if it exists, it exists, and until it has been fixed, it throws a wrench into the design-sketching process.

Associated Link: See original post for further details and comments

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.