Skip to main content
UsabilityNews.com - for all the latest in usability and human-computer interaction
The British HCI Group
 
 
The All the Latest section presents all general usability news articles


 
  advanced search
 

All the Latest

High Fidelity and the Problem with 'Sketching'


Source: dexodesign.com, 28 August 2007
Submitted by Russell Wilson

This past June I attended UPA's 2007 conference in Austin, Texas. The keynote was given by Bill Buxton, Principal Researcher, Microsoft Research. The focus of Bill's presentation was 'sketching', a timeless core tool for creative design, that in software design is often bypassed in favor of high fidelity digital design tools. He presented two points regarding sketching that made a strong impression on me:

1. No higher resolution than required to communicate the intended purpose/concept;

2. Resolution of the rendering does not suggest a degree of refinement of the concept that exceeds its actual state.

Since the conference, I've been evangelizing this concept internally to my team (product design) as well as to product management and development. But I've hit a few snags in the fast paced world of software development. Namely:

- HIGH FIDELITY SELLS, LOW FIDELITY IS DISMISSED
With many projects facing complex priorities, deadlines, demands from the sales team, and countless other inputs, rough sketches are often not compelling and are easily overlooked or dismissed. A picture is worth a thousand words, but only if the picture is pretty. I constantly push back on higher resolution early on, but without higher resolution the project often doesn't get started in the first place. It's as if a high resoluton rendering is needed to inspire interest, only to be trashed and reworked through the correct sketching process once the project gets moving.

- HIGH FIDELITY COMMUNICATES A SOLUTION, LOW FIDELITY COMMUNICATES A WORK IN PROGRESS
(which is good for execs, but problematic for Development)
Here's one that's a little controversial (until you understand what I'm really trying to say). Low fidelity (rightfully so) communicates an unfinished design; a work in progress. And as Bill states, this is what you want... if your audience is marketing or decision-making executives. But with development it can be a little tricky. When we present something polished-looking to Development, even if it's not completely fleshed out, their reaction tends to be "that looks awesome - when can we get this from you so that we can plug it in?" When we present a sketch or something rough, the reaction is often to go and try to do it themselves.

In some situations this could be a good thing, and may be exactly what Bill is advocating - the roughness encourages others to think and contribute their own ideas instead of assuming it's already done. But in some cases unfortunately, it doesn't promote collaboration - Development just picks up the ball and runs with it without ever looking back. Yes, I know, it's a problem with process and culture. But if it exists, it exists, and until it has been fixed, it throws a wrench into the design-sketching process.

 


External link to another web site Associated Link:
See original post for further details and comments


Other News

Poor Shopping Basket Usability will hinder Christmas Rush
Source: UN, 20 November 2008
 
A new study from eDigitalResearch identifies customer service and online shopping basket usability as the two key areas where online retailers need to improve.

Future Phones to Read Your Voice, Gestures
Source: Wired, 19 November 2008
 
Five years from now, it is likely that the mobile phone you will be holding will be a smooth, sleek brick — a piece of metal and plastic with a few grooves in it and little more.

Why Digital Research is important in tough Financial Times
Source: Financial Times, 18 November 2008
 
With the banking sector moving towards consolidation, it is crucial that customers are understood, reacted to and rewarded for their loyalty.

Get Ready for 'Ergobamanomics'
Source: AssemblyBlog via ergonomics in the news , 17 November 2008
 
Is President Elect, Barack Obama, a secret ergonomics and usability enthusiast?

The Most Dreaded Keyword Phrase
Source: SearchEngineLand, 15 November 2008
 
In website usability, one of the hardest obstacles to overcome is the mentality of “This is what I would do.”

User Experience Standards Missing from Web 2.0 Designs
Source: UN, 14 November 2008
 
Usability professionals should be more involved with the development of Web 2.0 tools.

New technology showcased at World Usability Day
Source: User Vision, 13 November 2008
 
Today is World Usability Day!

Review: 16 User Interface Prototyping Tools
Source: Dexo Design, 12 November 2008
 
People constantly ask me what the best prototyping or mockup tool is, so I decided to do a review of all the tools I’m aware of.

Radio 4's PM show announces Winner of 'Show Us a Better Way'
Source: BBC, 11 November 2008
 
Ever been frustrated that you can't find out something that ought to be easy to find? Ever been baffled by league tables or 'performance indicators'?

Cisco Systems extends Product Usability Research
Source: Catalyst Resources, 10 November 2008
 
Cisco is conducting extensive usability research with Catalyst Resources, into complex new technologies.

 
 

 

home | contribute | subscribe | news feed/RSS | search | contact us | disclaimer

UsabilityNews.com (version 1.4), along with its associated web site and content,
are all strictly © Copyright of the British HCI Group 2001-2008. All rights reserved.

Joanna Bawa (editor), Dave Clarke (founder, designer and developer). Ian Parry (graphics).