| |
|
 |
Web 2.0: Too Smart by a Half?
Source: Computer Technology Review, 25 June 2008
Submitted by
Joanna Bawa
By Joe Sokohl
Ah, yes, it’s time to update your blog, check your tweets on Twitter, update your LinkedIn connections, and Web 2.0-ify your life. Or maybe you’re feeling pressured to 2.0-ify your company? As businesses rush to follow Web 2.0 ephemera, what effect are applications having on people and their ability to just get stuff done? Does the mere fact that a widget exists mean that a user experience is somehow better?
Many innovations come through in Web 2.0 implementations. Users are presented with a wide variety of controllable, malleable, formable experiences. Lightweight engineering solutions break the stranglehold of ponderous approaches that have stifled innovation.
And yet…what is the impact of so many choices? Will the Web 2.0 generation’s epitaph be, “They died with their options open?” When is too much choice too much? In addition, a rush to add the coolest glows and shapes and transitions might win over marketing suits but lose users.
THE USER EXPERIENCE OF WEB 2.0 When we talk about Web 2.0, we need to define of course what we mean. First of all, the innovation of a service-oriented architectural approach can innovate an organization’s idea of the Web as a platform and a service. In addition, we now see the rise of Enterprise 2.0, a melding of Web 2.0 approaches with the sensibilities of the productivity, cost-efficiency, and innovation that enterprises demand.
Yet Web 2.0 also means application development can quickly provide unique interaction behaviors and quick access to persistent data. Using technologies and approaches such as AJAX, RSS, Ruby on Rails, Adobe’s Flex, Microsoft’s Silverlight, and others, developers can develop unique, specific applications quickly. They can easily deliver rich Internet applications (RIAs) using Web technologies, mimicking behaviors that desktop applications provide. Beyond Web 1.0, the new approaches provide expressiveness possibilities that have simply not been technically available. Too, new thinking creates approaches such as mashups, which can bring powerful and meaningful combinations of data together with almost no development effort. And within organizations, groups are creating lightweight collaboration tools, encouraging innovation across organizational silos, and increasing the speed and utility of information flows through self-publishing as well as the bottom-up creation of ad-hoc networks.
We’ve gotten across the chasm with the Web; no longer are masses of people outside looking in. Instead, most people understand and accept that the Web is useful, that it provides information and transaction that they need and (sometimes) trust, and that it pervades their working lives. And as Web 2.0 approaches become ubiquitous, people encounter them not just on their Internet-connected computers but also on their phones, in their cars, and in their homes.
Now, users have more control over their experience. They can choose how to view data, how to display information, and which specific applications to use with almost unfettered control. Web 2.0 technology enables developers to create almost anything…and therein lies the problem.
Associated Link:
Full article: Web 2.0: Too Smart by a Half?
|
|
|
 |
|
New Report: Innovative Marketing in the Digital World Source: E-consultancy, 7 October 2008 A new report from E-consultancy provides a distillation of ideas and suggestions provided by digital marketing experts. Linking Industry with Academia Source: unknown, 6 October 2008 Customer experience research consultancy, fhios, based in London, has just launched an innovative internship programme, aimed primarily at postgraduate students. Online Travel Booking: What influences Consumers? Source: Webcredible, 4 October 2008 What influences consumers when booking a holiday? How can travel companies offer the best user experience? Getting the Word out Source: UN, 3 October 2008 I SAID, I'M ON THE TRAIN... Voice recognition technology can now translate all those pesky garbled voicemails into manageable text messages. Mobile hardware outpaces Software and User Capabilities Source: ComputerWorld, 2 October 2008 The main issue dissuading users from employing all the capabilities of their mobile devices is the complexity involved in operating them. Gesturing, not Drowning Source: UN, 1 October 2008 The newly launched Gyration Air Mouse with MotionSense technology is designed to work in the air or on a flat surface. Usability as an ERP Selection Criteria Source: TechWorld, 30 September 2008 What careth big hairy Enterprise Resource Planning for usability? More than you might imagine. Expert Q&A: The Latest Thinking on Computer-Related Pain Source: NY Times via Ergonomics in the News, 29 September 2008 Controversy continues over whether typing on a computer could cause repetitive strain injuries of the hand, arm and shoulder. Has that debate been settled?
Talking Websites could Improve Sales and Accessibility Source: BusinessInBerkshire, 27 September 2008 An IT Analysis report says that making websites talk improves accessibility and sales. Documentation: the Hidden Challenge of Mobile Interface Design Source: UN, 26 September 2008 Multiple functions per key, animation, gesture, and industry regulation. Fantastic for the end-user, but what about the poor information architect?
|
|
|