| |
|
 |
User Interviews - Analysis Simplified
Source: Webcredible, 6 January 2009
Submitted by
Alistair Gray
You've conducted the interviews - enlightening weren't they? It's now time to put all that information that's in your head down on paper, and pull it all together into a complete picture.
FORM YOUR FINDINGS INTO A NARRATION After interviews you'll find that you've lots of interesting thoughts and ideas bouncing around your head, but probably in no clear structure. The results will be much easier to understand and convey to others if they are ordered into a clear narration. The best way to do this to do this is to put everything down on paper and then sift through the results to create a final unified story. * Put all the concepts, ideas and findings you found in each interview onto post-it notes (each point should be on its own note). * Try to avoid long sentences as you'll need to be able to quickly scan it and know what it refers to, each post-it should only contain up to 10 words. * Feel free to use short quotes or simple summaries if they sum up the finding well. * Add a number or an interviewee name to the corner so you can keep track where each post-it came from. * If you interviewed people from differing groups (for example new and returning customers) patterns will be easier to spot if you put a symbol on each post-it (or used colour co-ordinated post-its) to show which group they belonged to.
Take your time with this, as you may find the original groupings change over time. This is often called an 'affinity diagram'. An advantage of using post-its is that you can see the entirety of your results at once, rather than seeing a small part on a screen at any one time. Seeing the 'big picture' will help you visualise what is going on more easily than attempting this visualisation in your head alone. Another advantage is that post-its give you the flexibility to make further changes to your diagram if and when needed.
DON'T FORGET WHY YOU CONDUCTED THE INTERVIEWS The aims of interviews are to discover: * Users' needs and goals. * How users complete tasks on your site (or would do if functionality was available). * What users think the site offers them (and what more they really want/need).
This may act as a useful framework to apply your findings, and should be remembered whilst conducting the analysis. But keep in mind that the beauty of interviews is their flexibility so if you feel placing an alternative focus on the results clarifies your findings, you can do so.
BOUNCE YOUR IDEAS OFF SOMEONE ELSE Stand in front of your post-its and talk your findings through with someone (or several people). Encourage questions. You will not be able to answer every question, but you will find where gaps in your explanations are. Talking through your findings will also help further clarify your thoughts, and you'll realise where the gaps are in your overall picture. You may also find bouncing ideas off people who didn't attend the interviews useful. Seeing the results with someone with a different perspective from your own can generate ideas you may not have considered otherwise.
TAKE YOUR TIME You will find the first couple of hours will be filled with a frenzy of writing and grouping post-its, but you should then sleep on the result. You will find your subconscious will keep on working on the problems, and you may well find you wake up with further ideas, or when taking a soak in a bath, or on the walk home. There will always be further bits to add, and changes to be made to your affinity diagram. Take your time over the each stage, you will have been given a phenomenal amount of information to process during the interviews, so ensure everything relevant gets down and a clear overall message is able to develop.
Once you're done it just leaves the 'simple' matter of: * Making whatever changes are needed to your site * Producing personas * Diagnosing problems with your current site * Directing new design concepts
...or another one of the thousands of problems interviews can feed incredibly useful information into. But these "small" problems might be made easier knowing your hard work will pay off come go live.
Associated Link:
Webcredible
|
|
|
 |
|
All change at the top for System Concepts Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009 Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts. Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up Source: UN, 2 July 2009 Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages... Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009 The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website. Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus Source: UN, 30 June 2009 Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier. Cell Phones that Listen and Learn Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009 New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds. Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009 Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers. Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’ Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009 In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.
And what do you do? Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009 How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll. Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009 It's all about 'meaningful use'. Glossy monitors look good but can hurt Source: QUT, 23 June 2009 A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.
|
|
|