DIS 2002: Xtreme Programming makes Good Partner to User-Centred Design

Extreme Programming methods have been seen as a system for producing design prototypes that is incompatible with the methods of user-centred design. However, a team from Xerox PARC showed the audience at the Designing Interactive Systems 2002 conference that XP and UCD can be complementary. Telling the story of two design processes for embedding information management into email, researchers Victoria Bellotti, Nicholas Ducheneaut, Mark Howard and Ian Smith of Xerox PARC and Christine Neuwirth of Carnegie Mellon University compared the outcomes, concluding their first model was unsuccessful even 'with a user-centred approach, largely because fieldwork inspired engineering repeatedly led to innovations that delivered no significant end-user advantages over what was already supported' by available systems.

They defined user-centred methods in this context as 'including fieldwork to uncover target user practices and requirements, scenarios of use and grounded brainstorms to explore design ideas, rough look-and-feel prototypes to walk through usability and informal user evaluations of design ideas'.

But, for their second exploration, the team 'adopted XP as an approach to keep design closely tied to fieldwork findings and usage experience, with fieldworkers playing the part of customer representatives'. This approach, they conclude, was far more successful, giving a usable prototype in a fraction of the time of the first.

Among the benefits they cite is the mechanism it gives for feature prioritisation. Ideas are written up as stories on individual cards and then, at each iteration of development, all stories are considered but only those which are viewed as important are selected for implementation. This passes the responsibility for deciding how to use resources to the fieldworkers (as stand-in customers): relieving engineers of the expectation management that they had had to undertake in the first project. With XP, engineering did what it said on the card, handing back problems and strategy decisions. 'An understanding of the limits of what can be accomplished is far better distributed amongst the stakeholders,' the team reported.

All change at the top for System Concepts
Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009
 
Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts.

Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up
Source: UN, 2 July 2009
 
Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages...

Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue
Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009
 
The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website.

Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus
Source: UN, 30 June 2009
 
Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier.

Cell Phones that Listen and Learn
Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009
 
New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds.

Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing
Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009
 
Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers.

Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’
Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009
 
In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.

And what do you do?
Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009
 
How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll.

Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption
Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009
 
It's all about 'meaningful use'.

Glossy monitors look good but can hurt
Source: QUT, 23 June 2009
 
A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.