| |
 |
 |
Rosenfeld explains Enterprise Information Architecture
Source: UN, 21 November 2002
Submitted by
Ann Light
Last week Lou Rosenfeld, a director of the new Asilomar Institute for Information Architecture and co-author of IA bible "Information Architecture for the World Wide Web", explained how to take on organisational resistance, to the London AIGA Experience Design meeting.
Rosenfeld addressed himself to the issue of practising information architecture in an unfriendly enterprise environment. Work of organisational change that is now frequently attempted in 3-6 months should take 3-6 years, he warned, and then went on to outline how to do IA the thorough and effective way.
The outcome should be entrepreneurial, he said, in that it involves services marketed to internal clients and has the goal of self-sustainability. Services should be presented in a modular fashion with a logical migration path and, critically, the changes to existing practice should be phased, starting with projects that are low hanging fruit and using a selective roll-out. He told his audience to use their early successes as models. He also suggested that they anticipate greater centralisation among and within business units over time and support different levels of centralisation concurrently.
He juxtaposed the trend toward autonomy inherent in the cheap, easy-to-use democratising technology of the Web, playing to the human tendency towards running things ones own way against the organisation's desire for centralisation to simplify and cheapen and users' desire for a single-point of access. 'These tend to cancel each other out, getting us nowhere,' he concluded.
Despite this, the prevalent culture is to expect any changes in IA to be conducted all at once - including all subsites, to be conducted immediately, and to be handled 'with few resources and people, such as one sad webmaster, and in a way that minimises organisational learning, eg. by hiring an outside consultant or agency'. He said this showed little understanding of what it takes, on management's part.
Not only was it essential to implement a bottom-up information architecture, but this needed to be carried out in such a way that the architectural designs could be implemented and maintained. To this end, he touched on six areas that need attention:
1. Structure: make IA a separate business unit, 2. Staffing: recognise the strategic and tactical components, 3. Economic Model: offer fee and free services; learn from existing models, 4. Offerings: provide a modular mix of services, tools, and consulting, 5. Timing: take a long-term vision; go for phased roll-out, 6. Marketing: take an entrepreneurial business model, with a service orientation and flexible scope and naming.
Rosenfeld was in town with the Nielsen Norman Group, delivering seminars in IA. An interview with him on more general IA issues and the emergence of the profession will appear soon. Meanwhile, see UN story Morville on Information Architecture and its new Institute for more on recent IA developments.
|
|
 |
 |
|
All change at the top for System Concepts Source: System Concepts Ltd, 3 July 2009 Leslie Fountain has been promoted to joint Managing Director of leading usability consultancy System Concepts. Life in UCD immortalised in fiction: you couldn't make it up Source: UN, 2 July 2009 Sarah Herman's fictitious book on life in a user-centred design company has hit the shelves and The Guardian's book pages... Interfaces Magazine - Issue 79: The Education Issue Source: Interaction Group, 1 July 2009 The latest issue of Interfaces is now available as a free download from the Interaction Website. Two new Behavioural research Tools from Noldus Source: UN, 30 June 2009 Tool updates make on-site behavioural data collection easier. Cell Phones that Listen and Learn Source: MIT Technology Review, 29 June 2009 New software tracks a user's behavior by monitoring everyday sounds. Top Six Don’ts for Usability Testing Source: FutureNow Inc., 27 June 2009 Six tips for creating quality usability tests to ensure useful feedback from testers. Usability: ‘Lovely software. But I can’t work it’ Source: FT.com, 26 June 2009 In a recent survey by Global Graphics, 77 per cent of office workers estimate they lose up to one hour a week because business software is difficult to use.
And what do you do? Source: Dexo Design, 25 June 2009 How do you describe your job role? Here are the results of a recent 'Preferred UX/UI Title' Poll. Most Doctors cite Usability as critical to Electronic Health Record Adoption Source: TMCNet, 24 June 2009 It's all about 'meaningful use'. Glossy monitors look good but can hurt Source: QUT, 23 June 2009 A new advisory cites research which suggests high gloss monitors make users sit awkwardly.
|
|
|